The most prevalent and daunting problem in college football right now is that of illegal benefits given to college athletes by agents, and the premature contact between the player and agent. It has led to the controversy surrounding Reggie Bush, and has cost USC scholarships, bowl appearances in the future, and was very close to costing the university its 2006 National Championship. The university, clearly scarred in a bad way by the scandal, returned its copy of the Heisman Trophy to Reggie Bush in an effort to distance itself from the running back and from that corrupt era of Trojan football. Now the Heisman Trophy Committee is considering stripping Bush of the trophy altogether. Why has USC and Reggie Bush incurred such shame? An agent gave illegal benefits to Reggie Bush while still in college, including the financing of a new house for his mother. This incident 5 years ago and the recent investigation of this issue brought a dark, secretive, illicit part of college football into the bright lights in the past week.
In the past 5 days, 3 players were accused by the NCAA of illegally accepting money and benefits from agents. South Carolina tight end Weslye Saunders, Alabama defensive end Marcell Darius, and most notably, Florida center and 2010 First Round draft pick Maurkice Pouncey have been accused by the NCAA. Specifically, Pouncey was accused of accepting $100,000 from an agent, an accusation Maurkice has denied. Now, Georgia has been informed that it will be investigated by the NCAA this week.
This issue has caused coaches such as Nick Saban and Urban Meyer to address the issue as an “epidemic,” and has led Nick Saban to now infamously refers to these agents as “pimp”-like. SEC media day was controlled by talk of the agent problem in college football, and football itself was second fiddle. And for good reason; this problem is extremely important. These athletes abide by the rules and regulations of the NCAA, the governing body of college athletics. The NCAA regulations state that any improper benefits taken by players from agents or otherwise will result in the loss of the player’s eligibility. The loss of a player’s eligibility can also impose sanctions on the university for which he plays, as USC has learned in a harsh way. Therefore, this pervasive problem needs to be fixed, and offseason media days need to become less focused on corruption and scandal in college football.
Before providing a solution, lets get to the root of the problem itself. Who is to blame for this problem? The answer is everyone, including the NCAA, but most importantly and most to blame are the players themselves. It is comparable to steroids. In terms of the steroid problem, the manufacturers who made the products too readily available were to blame, the doctors who allowed the players to take them were to blame, the managers and players who knew about it but didn’t say anything were to blame, the owners who knew about it but enjoyed their revenue flow too much to say anything were to blame, and many fans and journalists who showed their apathy with their checkbooks were to blame. So many people were to blame, and these other people and sources enabled the culture, but who took the steroids? The players. Yes, the influences on these players from outside sources were not positive, and there were pressures on the players to take steroids, but at the end of the day, it was the players who stuck needles into themselves.
The same situation exists in college football. There is no way that Nick Saban, Urban Meyer, and Pete Carroll, among others, did not know that something was amiss. Reggie Bush came from a poor family, and when he began driving Escalades and Corvettes to practice, Carroll knew indirectly if not directly that something was being done that wasn’t quite right, or legal. The coaches knew. The athletic directors had to know. Obviously the agents knew. However, even though the problem could have been stymied by all these sources, the fact is that the first move was made by the players themselves. Reggie Bush didn’t need to take the money, the cars, and the house. He didn’t need to handicap his program for years after his departure, he didn’t need to jeopardize his program’s 2006 National Championship, and he didn’t need to risk his own Heisman Trophy. He knew it was wrong, he knew the possible sanctions, and HE ACCEPTED THE IMPROPER BENEFITS. Nick Saban said in his press conference, “How would you feel if someone did this to your son or daughter?” Nick, the fact is that these college students are adults who can make their own decisions and need to accept responsibility for these decisions. These players aren’t puppets to whom something is “done” without their control. Opportunities are presented (some of them illegal) and these players decide to put their interests ahead of that of their university, their coaches, and their teammates. Therefore, the root of the problem is the players themselves, with the influence of the agents dependent upon the consent of the players themselves.
How can this problem be fixed? First, the player needs to be addressed. However, at this point, the player already faces heavy sanctions if discovered during his college career. He loses his eligibility immediately and is unable to resume college play. The only problem with this strong sanction is that most players engaging with agents are planning to move to the NFL, and therefore their eligibility isn’t extremely important to them. The next and more important step is to heavily penalize the schools themselves. For example, in the USC case, if a precedent was set in the form of a vacated National Championship and, say, a 10 year ban from bowl play, a message would be sent to coaches and athletic directors that this behavior and acceptance will not be tolerated, and that heavy, program handicapping penalties will ensue. If these type of penalties are established, there will no longer be coaches and AD’s looking the other way on these cases the way Pete Carroll and Urban Meyer appear to have done. These coaches will instead seek out the problems in order to quell them before the NCAA can find out and impose sanctions on the program.
The next way to address the problem is to address the agents. If an agent is caught with a player in college, his license should be suspended for five years. Players in the NFL who have hired these agents will have to find new agents if their agents are caught with college players. This solution will do two important things. First, it will discourage many agents from attaching to college players, because while the rewards will still be there, the risks will be significantly higher, and because of the steps I defined in the previous paragraph, the chance of being caught will be much higher. In addition, agents would be much less likely to associate themselves with college players because their existing clients will be likely to switch agents if they knew of their agents’ dealings with college players in the past. These NFL players will not want to face the possibility of their agent being taken from them without their control, and thereby some will leave their agents on their own terms in order to find a more stable option (ie. an agent who will not get his license suspended at an arbitrary time because he does not deal with college players). These two consequences of this proposed regulation will invariably force the corrupt agents from the sport and will quickly clean the image of the college football stars, and that of college football itself.
Recent Comments