In last night’s Phillies Astros game, Ryan Howard was ejected in extra innings after he tossed his bat towards the dugout after being called out on a check swing by third base umpire Scott Barry. It was a very controversial call, because there were no position players available on the bench to replace Howard, and Roy Oswalt was forced to enter the game in left field, while Raul Ibanez moved to 1st base. Then, 2 innings later, Roy Oswalt was up to bat with two outs and runners on 1st and 2nd, the very spot in the order where Howard would have batted, and was retired to end the game.
The game was impacted greatly by this ejection, and the important question is, should the ejection even have occurred? I approach this situation wearing two hats. First, I am an objective fan, as I am neither fan of the Phillies nor of the Astros, and both my favorite teams are all but mathematically out of the race. Second, I am a certified umpire, so I understand exactly what Scott Barry was feeling in that important moment.
With that being said, I think Scott Barry made a critical error in his ejection of Ryan Howard for a few reasons. First, NO WORDS WERE SAID! When a player or manager is ejected, it is extremely rare for the ejection to come before any words are stated. The actions have to be extremely demonstrative in order for an ejection to be justified in this case. A simple toss of the bat is, in my opinion, nowhere near enough to warrant or justify an ejection in extra innings, even though Howard was angry about a check swing call earlier in the at bat as well.
Second, the job of the umpires is to be invisible on the field if possible. Scott Barry did not assume the role of invisibility by ejecting one of the best players in the game, in extra innings, in the middle of a pennant race, when he didn’t say anything to the umpire. That was Barry’s big mistake.
Finally, as an umpire, it is important never to assume the intentions of players. For example, if I think that a coach is second-guessing me in the dugout, or on the third base line, I need to be completely sure that he is directing his comments towards me and is not simply referring to someone or something else before I take any action whatsoever, even if it is just to warn him. In Barry’s case, he should have been more careful to ensure that when tossing the bat Howard wasn’t simply angry at himself, or was simply tossing his bat towards the dugout so someone else could “pick him up” for the next inning on defense so he didn’t need to return to the dugout. Instead, Barry made a wrongful, quick assumption about Howard’s actions and immediately ejected him from the game. It was at this point that Howard overreacted and began charging down the third base line toward Barry.
Could this ejection have cost the Phillies the game? It absolutely could have. Raul Ibanez dropped a ball at first that could have kept a Houston run off the board in the 16th, and Oswalt was forced to bat with 2 outs in the bottom of the 16th instead of Howard. Therefore, the Phils could very well have been cost a game because of an overreaction and terrible decision by umpire Scott Barry, and one would hate to see such a decision decide a pennant race.
Recent Comments